The case for timberPart 3 of 3

Can mass timber cost less than conventional framing?

Rendering of a prefabricated timber structure
Rendering of a prefabricated timber structure

Set carbon, quality, and the look of exposed wood aside for a moment. Assume the only thing that matters is cost. Four things still favor a mass timber kit.

  • The kit is a fixed price. A specific package, to a specific site, on a specific day. It anchors the budget and does not move when weather delays the site.
  • Millimeter tolerances. Every fit-out material, fixture, and built-in can be fabricated to the model instead of to field conditions. Coordinating mechanical, electrical, and plumbing before fabrication means owners can choose economical, available products.
  • Less labor. Where skilled trades are scarce, which is most mountain markets, a flat-pack kit that assembles quickly saves labor cost directly.
  • Fewer trades. Visual-grade timber is the finish. No drywall, no painter, no ceiling contractor for the exposed areas. Strike the line items.

None of these show up when you compare the price of panels to the price of studs, which is why mass timber can look expensive on paper and land closer than expected on the final number. The economics differ on every project, and we will tell you when they do not work. More often than people expect, they do.

Every item on that list depends on decisions made early, before the drawings are frozen. The next series, Designing for the factory, is about when and how those decisions get made.

Adapted with permission from a note by our colleagues at Red Falls Timber Co.

Start a Project

Bring us in before the big decisions are fixed.